Otherwise your transfer will be twice as slow. Both offer about the same feature set beyond this one difference.ġ) Yes you Should put the NAS on a wired connection. Which slices your drive into 100GB slices and mirror the slices rather then whole drives. Synology's main advantage is when you use SHR. What's are some good, turn-key solutions for me? The Pis are running Debian.ħ) Don't care about remote accessibility over the Interwebs at this time in fact I'd really rather not. A machine with a guided mode, easy GUI, or maybe even a wizard would be good.Ħ) If it matters, all machines that are not Raspberry Pis are running Windows 10. I don't trust myself to do a lot of manual configuration on the NAS. For actual WiFi I have a Netgear Orbi base station and satellite.ĥ) I have slowly set up OpenMediaVault 5 with hand-holding, but I've never even looked at ZFS other than drowning in the occasional Jim Salter article, and never asked much of it beyond serving movies. It's basically locked down I can change the WiFi settings and a whole lot else. Anything that can serve over DLNA is fine.Ĥ) I have an AT&T Gateway, BG210, and it sucks for configuration options. Need lots of space for media, aside from the PC/Laptop backups.ģ) I don't like Plex, I don't need Plex, I don't want Plex. But I'm ready to move on.ġ) Can't run a hardline from the PC to the NAS, but I can put the NAS on the router.Ģ) Backing up a LOT of movies/TV shows lately, and I'm not done yet. The external drive was a stop-gap and the media server was a fun project. Right now I have an external HDD for the PC backups (on one machine only) and a Pi 4 for the media serving. I want to have a NAS for two duties: PC/Laptops nightly backups and media serving.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |